Sometimes, achieving success can bring unexpected challenges. In the world of space exploration, the United States Space Force, Air Force, and NASA have found themselves relying heavily on SpaceX for space launch services. While this hasn't been an official decision, it has become the default situation due to SpaceX's remarkable success in terms of cost efficiency and launch slot availability.
However, the unintended consequence of this success is the deprioritization of rocket research and development efforts by the Space Force, Air Force, and NASA. Some argue that since SpaceX is already handling the necessary research and development for space access, there's no need for the government to invest in similar endeavors.
This approach raises a crucial question: What if the U.S. government had halted aircraft research and development when the Ford Tri-Motor was successfully flying between Cleveland and Chicago? Back in the late 1930s, President Franklin Roosevelt recognized the importance of continued investment in incremental and breakthrough technology. He understood that relying solely on current capabilities without investing in future advancements would hinder progress.
The current attitude of prioritizing spending on existing technology instead of investing in the development of new technology is not a new phenomenon. The historical example of the Air Force resisting the development of GPS to allocate funds for more immediate needs, like purchasing more F-16s, serves as a case in point. This short-sighted perspective has been present throughout the decades, reminiscent of arguing in the 1930s that funds allocated to the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) should be diverted to produce more existing aircraft.
However, history has shown the value of incremental changes and research. NACA's investments in incremental developments, such as improved cowling, wings, propellers, and superchargers, contributed to the increased lethality of U.S. warplanes during World War II. These incremental changes, available at the outset of the war, proved more valuable than having more outdated aircraft.
The challenge lies in convincing military personnel that investing in infrastructure, industrial base, and research and development, even if it means fewer immediate resources, is crucial for long-term success. The analogy of needing "seed corn" for future harvests illustrates the importance of continuous investment and planning. China's commitment to research and development in reusable rockets and rocket technology highlights the strategic importance of ongoing innovation.
In conclusion, NASA, the Space Force, and the Air Force must prioritize and continue investing in basic research and development activities. While budget constraints pose challenges, maintaining a focus on future challenges is essential to ensure readiness for the next great frontier.
spacex
spacex launch
iss
spacex launch today
launch today
axiom space
axiom mission 3
space x launch
axiom 3
spacex launch tonight
axiom launch
spacex launch today live
axiom 3 launch
spacex twitter
who owns spacex
what year was the latest space mission in which humans successfully landed on the moon?
spacex dragon
spacex x
Well-crafted content that resonates with its audience
ReplyDeleteThe share buttons are conveniently placed – sharing made easy!
ReplyDeleteI've shared this article with my friends; the content is too good not to pass along. Keep it up!
ReplyDelete